Skip to content

Stratified Cuboidal Epithelium

  • Two to three layers of cuboidal cells; sturdier than simple cuboidal but still keeps a round lumen.
  • Common in sweat ducts, salivary duct segments, distal lactiferous ducts, and short transition zones.
  • Expect even nuclei, smooth basement membrane, and possible myoepithelial support depending on site.
  • Basal cells p63/CK5/6+, luminal cells CK7/CK19/EMA+; myoepithelial rim (skin/breast) is SMA/calponin+.
  • 2 neat layers of cuboidal cells.
  • Luminal cells EMA+/CEA+, outer/basal p63+ (sometimes SMA+).
  • Sometimes the luminal cell has a slightly eosinophilic/apical “cuticle.”
  • Why mention: this is the prototype; lots of adnexal tumors mimic this.

Two (sometimes three) superposed layers of cuboidal cells (one cuboidal layer on top of another, rarely more than 3)

Why: more than one layer = better protection from lumen contents and from external compression, but keeping cells cuboidal preserves a regular, round lumen.

Luminal/superficial layer is also cuboidal (not squamous, not flattened)

Why: this keeps the lumen circular and patent — useful in ducts that open to the surface or that get squeezed.

Basal layer sits on a continuous basement membrane

Why: duct wall needs a firm base so it doesn’t collapse or detach in fibrous stroma.

Lumen is usually small and regular

Why: this is a conducting / modifying duct, not a storage cavity.


Cells with central, round nuclei in both layers

Why: hallmark that this is “true” stratified cuboidal, not squamous maturing upward.

Cytoplasm scant to moderate, eosinophilic to pale

Why: these cells are not doing heavy secretion like acini; they are a lining.

Minimal pleomorphism, orderly stacking

Why: normal duct lining should look monotonous; atypia here is a red flag for dysplasia or adnexal neoplasia.

Occasional apical clearing or small microvilli (esp. in sweat ducts)

Why: allows minor ion handling at the luminal surface.


Apical surface of the top cuboidal layer faces the duct lumen

Why: this is the interface that contacts sweat/saliva/milk → needs to be smooth and controlled.

Basal cuboidal cells attached to BM by hemidesmosomes

Why: ducts pass through CT, fat, sometimes muscle — they are moved and squeezed; basal cells must stay put.

Lateral surfaces of adjacent cells interlock

Why: prevents the duct wall from gaping when pressure changes.


Apical tight junctions between superficial cuboidal cells

Why: keep duct contents in the lumen and prevent leakage into stroma (important for sweat and salivary ducts).

Adherens junctions (E-cadherin/catenins) along lateral borders

Why: maintain epithelial coherence in a small-diameter tube.

Desmosomes present between both basal and superficial layers

Why: ducts are subject to traction (e.g. around hair follicles, in nipple/areola); desmosomes stop tearing.

Basal attachment via hemidesmosomes / integrins to basement membrane

Why: anchors whole epithelium to the duct wall scaffold.


Continuous, thin basement membrane around the duct

Why: gives a clear boundary between epithelial duct and surrounding gland/dermis.

Often surrounded by fibrous or myoepithelial tissue (organ-dependent)

Why: contraction or support from outside must not distort the epithelial tube.


(varies a bit by organ, but core pattern is similar)

Core epithelial / ductal markers:

  • CK7+ (most stratified ductal segments)

    Why: duct-type epithelium.

  • CK8/18+ (simple-type keratins often persist)

    Why: even stratified, it’s still gland/duct epithelium.

  • CK19+ (frequent in salivary / sweat ducts)

    Why: small-duct/ductal phenotype.

  • EMA+ / CEA+ luminally

    Why: ductal surface glycoproteins.

Basal/myoepithelial layer (when present around the duct):

  • p63+, SMA+, calponin+ (outside / basal)

    Why: tells you the duct is still in its native gland unit and not an invasive carcinoma taking its place.

Negative for endothelial (CD31, vWF) and mesothelial (WT1, calretinin) markers

Why: separates from other flat/small-lumen linings.

Skin / sweat duct–specific:

  • Luminal cells: CEA+, EMA+

  • Basal cells: p63+

    Why: classic eccrine duct two-layer profile.


  1. Sweat gland ducts (eccrine, apocrine portions in dermis)

    Why: ducts ascend through dermis, face variable pressure, and carry modified fluid → need reinforcement.

  2. Larger ducts of salivary glands (some interlobular/striated segments can be stratified cuboidal or stratified columnar)

    Why: near the oral opening, trauma and flow increase.

  3. Ducts of mammary gland / lactiferous segments (parts)

    Why: milk flow + nipple motion → stronger duct lining.

  4. Conjunctival / eyelid-related ducts (minor)

    Why: small ducts exposed to blinking/shear.


Reinforced conduit

Why: two cuboidal layers resist collapse and abrasion better than one simple layer.

Controlled luminal environment

Why: tight junctions + viable surface cells prevent gland secretions from leaking and being altered by interstitial fluid.

Mechanical protection at duct–surface junctions

Why: where a deep gland duct meets a more exposed surface (skin, oral mucosa), the epithelium must tolerate rubbing, stretching, and pH/sweat changes.


  • Background for adnexal tumors: many sweat/salivary adnexal neoplasms try to recapitulate a “central duct with stratified cuboidal lining.”

    Why: knowing the normal pattern helps recognize ductal differentiation (vs pure squamous).

  • Duct ectasia / chronic sialadenitis: epithelium may flatten or become more squamoid.

    Why: pressure/inflammation can simplify the lining.

  • Distinguish from stratified squamous: surface cells here stay cuboidal, nuclei central, no maturation to flat anuclear squames.

    Why: tells you it’s ductal, not surface mucosa.


  • Why stratified? duct needs extra protection / strength.
  • Why cuboidal (not squamous)? duct needs to keep a round, small lumen and sometimes modify its content.
  • Why only 2–3 layers? more would narrow lumen too much and block flow.

Mammary / lactiferous duct distal segments

Section titled “Mammary / lactiferous duct distal segments”
  • Often 2-layered cuboidal/low columnar, outer myoepithelial layer.
  • Hormonal/inflammatory changes can make it look “thicker.”
  • Why mention: background for ductal ectasia / periductal mastitis.

Salivary gland duct type (intralobular → interlobular segments)

Section titled “Salivary gland duct type (intralobular → interlobular segments)”
  • Can be stratified cuboidal or stratified columnar depending on level.
  • CK7+/CK19+, luminal EMA+/CEA+, with a myoepithelial/basal rim (p63+/SMA+).
  • Why mention: in chronic sialadenitis or near the oral opening it can look more squamoid → easy to miscall.

Transition to stratified columnar at mucosal outlets (e.g. major salivary duct entering oral cavity, eyelid/conjunctival ducts)

Section titled “Transition to stratified columnar at mucosal outlets (e.g. major salivary duct entering oral cavity, eyelid/conjunctival ducts)”
  • Starts stratified cuboidal, becomes stratified columnar to match surface.
  • Why mention: so you don’t think it’s “abnormal” that it’s not cuboidal all the way.